<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still 700 Miles from Sundance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews, news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3915</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3915</guid>
		<description>As we&#039;ve seen this year, critics can&#039;t always be trusted to get it right on a movie out of the gate. To be fair though, the negatives for Zodiac and Assassination of Jesse James typically didn&#039;t hit nearly the same level of utter hostility and bile that The Fountain accumulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we&#8217;ve seen this year, critics can&#8217;t always be trusted to get it right on a movie out of the gate. To be fair though, the negatives for Zodiac and Assassination of Jesse James typically didn&#8217;t hit nearly the same level of utter hostility and bile that The Fountain accumulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>I liked The Fountain a lot, but then quickly felt embarrassed as one critic after another dismantled it for being sentimental sci-fi slop.

Mayhap I need to check it out again as well.

I&#039;m also curious about Sleep Dealer. The Tarkovsky/Aronofsky line got me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked The Fountain a lot, but then quickly felt embarrassed as one critic after another dismantled it for being sentimental sci-fi slop.</p>
<p>Mayhap I need to check it out again as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also curious about Sleep Dealer. The Tarkovsky/Aronofsky line got me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3910</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3910</guid>
		<description>Give it another try, joel. It&#039;s one of those films that works at least a little bit better the second go around. Jackman&#039;s performance hit me a bit harder this time, too. 

Cool coincidence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it another try, joel. It&#8217;s one of those films that works at least a little bit better the second go around. Jackman&#8217;s performance hit me a bit harder this time, too. </p>
<p>Cool coincidence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s a coincidence. I was just moving up the Bluray for The Fountain in my queue (so many movies in my queue are unavailable right now) and I was thinking some space from all the hatred might make it a good movie to revisit. Your second viewing gives me hope Alexander. I initially liked it and then cooled a bit after reading review after review of pure hatred for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s a coincidence. I was just moving up the Bluray for The Fountain in my queue (so many movies in my queue are unavailable right now) and I was thinking some space from all the hatred might make it a good movie to revisit. Your second viewing gives me hope Alexander. I initially liked it and then cooled a bit after reading review after review of pure hatred for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3908</guid>
		<description>Foundas and others should love Quid Pro Quo since it seems to be directed like a laser beam on people&#039;s fascination with disabled people. Or could it turn out to be so thoroughly enmeshed in its subject matter as to be called &quot;disability porn,&quot; too? 

Sleep Dealer is one of those few films where the tiny little synopsis alone has me excited or at the very least interested.

I just gave The Fountain another spin and liked it considerably more the second time out. I still think it has a few problems, but I feel like I understand what Aronofsky was trying to do with it. It&#039;d be on my Top Ten of 2006 now, I think. In truth, I always *liked* it but some of the hyperbole surrounding it kind of turned me off and compelled me to look at what I preceived to be some of its flaws. Now, far away from all the hype, it somehow feels more alive than it did back when I saw it about fourteen months ago.

Oh, and this has everything to do with Sleep Dealer because of the Aronofsky comparison by Ramos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foundas and others should love Quid Pro Quo since it seems to be directed like a laser beam on people&#8217;s fascination with disabled people. Or could it turn out to be so thoroughly enmeshed in its subject matter as to be called &#8220;disability porn,&#8221; too? </p>
<p>Sleep Dealer is one of those few films where the tiny little synopsis alone has me excited or at the very least interested.</p>
<p>I just gave The Fountain another spin and liked it considerably more the second time out. I still think it has a few problems, but I feel like I understand what Aronofsky was trying to do with it. It&#8217;d be on my Top Ten of 2006 now, I think. In truth, I always *liked* it but some of the hyperbole surrounding it kind of turned me off and compelled me to look at what I preceived to be some of its flaws. Now, far away from all the hype, it somehow feels more alive than it did back when I saw it about fourteen months ago.</p>
<p>Oh, and this has everything to do with Sleep Dealer because of the Aronofsky comparison by Ramos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3907</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3907</guid>
		<description>Im curious about Quid Pro Quo too Glimmer. It looks odd. I like odd.

Looks like Foundas has a different take on The Wackness than the guy I quoted the other day. I&#039;ve heard in a couple of other places that it was good too.

At the very least it has Ben Kingsley, so at least there is that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im curious about Quid Pro Quo too Glimmer. It looks odd. I like odd.</p>
<p>Looks like Foundas has a different take on The Wackness than the guy I quoted the other day. I&#8217;ve heard in a couple of other places that it was good too.</p>
<p>At the very least it has Ben Kingsley, so at least there is that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glimmer</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator>glimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3901</guid>
		<description>http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0804,foundas,78906,20.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0804,foundas,78906,20.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0804,foundas,78906,20.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glimmer</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/comment-page-1/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>glimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/21/still-700-miles-from-sundance/#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>ok you know i&#039;m curious about quid pro quo.ah yes...sorry. you know that would be my pick from the things refed in your column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok you know i&#8217;m curious about quid pro quo.ah yes&#8230;sorry. you know that would be my pick from the things refed in your column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
