<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Nominees are&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews, news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3947</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3947</guid>
		<description>Then I am Peter Pan, &#039;cause that will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then I am Peter Pan, &#8217;cause that will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre de Plume</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre de Plume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only bizarre thing for me is that my two favorite movies of the year also tied for the most nominations. Am I just getting old?&quot;

No, Craig. You&#039;re getting old when you start liking Larry King&#039;s interview style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only bizarre thing for me is that my two favorite movies of the year also tied for the most nominations. Am I just getting old?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, Craig. You&#8217;re getting old when you start liking Larry King&#8217;s interview style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>Wow, third place! I really didn&#039;t connect with my name there. Awesome :).

Congrats to all the winners and everyone who participated. Thanks also to Craig for doing the number crunching. Look forward to next year&#039;s contest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, third place! I really didn&#8217;t connect with my name there. Awesome :).</p>
<p>Congrats to all the winners and everyone who participated. Thanks also to Craig for doing the number crunching. Look forward to next year&#8217;s contest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3933</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3933</guid>
		<description>No, no...

It&#039;s real gold. Gold isn&#039;t soft, you know. Put that down.

You&#039;&#039;re gonna break somebody&#039;s neck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s real gold. Gold isn&#8217;t soft, you know. Put that down.</p>
<p>You&#8221;re gonna break somebody&#8217;s neck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Flynn</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3932</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3932</guid>
		<description>LOL, Craig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, Craig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>er...it&#039;s a little bent. I was just hitting Mr. Holt over the head with it. (polishing it up a little with my sleeve) Here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er&#8230;it&#8217;s a little bent. I was just hitting Mr. Holt over the head with it. (polishing it up a little with my sleeve) Here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3929</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3929</guid>
		<description>*bows*

Thank you, one &amp; all...

Where&#039; s my scepter? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*bows*</p>
<p>Thank you, one &amp; all&#8230;</p>
<p>Where&#8217; s my scepter? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3911</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3911</guid>
		<description>Ha, Craig, that&#039;s funny. That&#039;s why we go to H-E. ;)

*places the crown on Serena&#039;s head as compensation for now offering congratulations earlier on her 5-for-5 Best Picture selection...* As Helen Mirren so unaccountably uttered last year, &quot;...The Queen!...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, Craig, that&#8217;s funny. That&#8217;s why we go to H-E. ;)</p>
<p>*places the crown on Serena&#8217;s head as compensation for now offering congratulations earlier on her 5-for-5 Best Picture selection&#8230;* As Helen Mirren so unaccountably uttered last year, &#8220;&#8230;The Queen!&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3906</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3906</guid>
		<description>You do the crown proud, Serena.

My failing in years past was to go on heart and gut and I always get burned. This year I went with my head...and got burned.

I had Atonement as my #1 pick for months, until it was roundly snubbed by all of the guilds.

Ah well. c&#039;est la vie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do the crown proud, Serena.</p>
<p>My failing in years past was to go on heart and gut and I always get burned. This year I went with my head&#8230;and got burned.</p>
<p>I had Atonement as my #1 pick for months, until it was roundly snubbed by all of the guilds.</p>
<p>Ah well. c&#8217;est la vie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3905</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3905</guid>
		<description>First of all, congrats to the LiC contest winners..

As for getting Best Picture right...

Well, y&#039;all brought it up. Otherwise I wouldn&#039;t have said a word...LMAO

I guess the little bird that told you, Craig, is the one that I got the call from this morning. I think his name begins with an  R? LOL

The absolute truth is: I&#039;m very passionate &amp; emotional about my choices every year.  So I&#039;ve never predicted. NEVER. 

But then Ryan asked me to join you guys &amp; I was enormously flattered. I couldn&#039;t say no - &amp; I really couldn&#039;t be associated with a nicer, more cool group of people.

Even though I&#039;ve never done this before in a serious way, I do have some knowledge of film &amp; acting. But
I&#039;ve been following the Oscars since I was around 10. So that&#039;s nearly 20 years. But, in the end, it really came down to instinct.

I knew MC &amp; NCFOM were pretty much locked up. I thought TWBB would be next on the list. Vying for the last  two slots were TDB&amp;TB, Juno, Atonement &amp; ITW. 

Atonement has unconventional elements but it LOOKS
like a BP nominee. It&#039;s British, has star crossed love elements, attractive young actors &amp; is based on a prestigious novel. DB is foreign. Just seemed too esoteric for their tastes. Which generally run to the middle brow. I was just talking here the other day about  how I didn&#039;t think Juno was going to make it. But
I ended up choosing Juno instead of ITW.. Almost everybody seems to love this picture - &amp; it cuts across all demographics. It&#039;s warm &amp; heartfelt. Plus, even though Sean Penn has been nominated four times &amp; has an Oscar, I didn&#039;t know if ITW could truly go the distance.

Juno just seemed to fit. Plus it was a comedy &amp; that particular slate of films was going to be pretty damn dark.  So I totally went with my gut...&amp; sometimes you have to.

Thank you so much for your hearty congrats, Craig, sartre &amp; jennybee. jennybee, you can have that quote. It&#039;s my gift to you. It&#039;s one of Blanchett&#039;s. LOL (Though I still worship the ground you walk on, sartre - &amp; you know it, too.)

How bout I take one of Ellen&#039;s? I&#039;m kind of partial to, &quot;Thundercats are GO!!!!!&quot; 

Y&#039;all are so generous &amp; sweet. I really appreciate it.

Anyone wants to borrow my crown, I&#039;ll lend it out 24/7. jennybee&#039;s a girl so she gets special privileges, you guys.

But I&#039;m very happy to be a Sultan. You all make  it worthwhile. Truly. Utterly. Completely.

Today is a very good day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, congrats to the LiC contest winners..</p>
<p>As for getting Best Picture right&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, y&#8217;all brought it up. Otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t have said a word&#8230;LMAO</p>
<p>I guess the little bird that told you, Craig, is the one that I got the call from this morning. I think his name begins with an  R? LOL</p>
<p>The absolute truth is: I&#8217;m very passionate &amp; emotional about my choices every year.  So I&#8217;ve never predicted. NEVER. </p>
<p>But then Ryan asked me to join you guys &amp; I was enormously flattered. I couldn&#8217;t say no &#8211; &amp; I really couldn&#8217;t be associated with a nicer, more cool group of people.</p>
<p>Even though I&#8217;ve never done this before in a serious way, I do have some knowledge of film &amp; acting. But<br />
I&#8217;ve been following the Oscars since I was around 10. So that&#8217;s nearly 20 years. But, in the end, it really came down to instinct.</p>
<p>I knew MC &amp; NCFOM were pretty much locked up. I thought TWBB would be next on the list. Vying for the last  two slots were TDB&amp;TB, Juno, Atonement &amp; ITW. </p>
<p>Atonement has unconventional elements but it LOOKS<br />
like a BP nominee. It&#8217;s British, has star crossed love elements, attractive young actors &amp; is based on a prestigious novel. DB is foreign. Just seemed too esoteric for their tastes. Which generally run to the middle brow. I was just talking here the other day about  how I didn&#8217;t think Juno was going to make it. But<br />
I ended up choosing Juno instead of ITW.. Almost everybody seems to love this picture &#8211; &amp; it cuts across all demographics. It&#8217;s warm &amp; heartfelt. Plus, even though Sean Penn has been nominated four times &amp; has an Oscar, I didn&#8217;t know if ITW could truly go the distance.</p>
<p>Juno just seemed to fit. Plus it was a comedy &amp; that particular slate of films was going to be pretty damn dark.  So I totally went with my gut&#8230;&amp; sometimes you have to.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for your hearty congrats, Craig, sartre &amp; jennybee. jennybee, you can have that quote. It&#8217;s my gift to you. It&#8217;s one of Blanchett&#8217;s. LOL (Though I still worship the ground you walk on, sartre &#8211; &amp; you know it, too.)</p>
<p>How bout I take one of Ellen&#8217;s? I&#8217;m kind of partial to, &#8220;Thundercats are GO!!!!!&#8221; </p>
<p>Y&#8217;all are so generous &amp; sweet. I really appreciate it.</p>
<p>Anyone wants to borrow my crown, I&#8217;ll lend it out 24/7. jennybee&#8217;s a girl so she gets special privileges, you guys.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m very happy to be a Sultan. You all make  it worthwhile. Truly. Utterly. Completely.</p>
<p>Today is a very good day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>I noticed the fact at the same place Alexander :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the fact at the same place Alexander :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I should have posted my thoughts on the nominations *here* I guess, not where I did (Name Those Nominees). Well, anyway, haha...

Congrats, joel, Andy H, Alison and Nick! Play hard, win hard! :-)

This Oscar guessing stuff is difficult. It seems like the last two years, for starters, would have been far easier to estimate but this year was something of a train wreck (though sort of a beautiful one, ahaha).

My only real gripe is Juno. I think its chances were helped enormously when so much of the field (Blood and No Country for starters) seemed so bleak. Atonement and Clayton are the most &quot;conventional&quot; Best Picture nominees, on paper, and I suppose we may have to think of the Best Picture category as routinely having one of those quirky little comedies among the final five--Sideways, Little Miss Sunshine and Juno, three out of four years where there was at least one film to lighten things up.

I am scratching my head over Blanchett for Elizabeth II, but she is quite loved.

Oh, and Craig--sorry for pointing out that Norbit had one nomination over Zodiac&#039;s zero in the other thread. Hadn&#039;t seen you point it out here. I suspect there are many online grumbling about that, though, as I saw it originally at H-E. Poor Zodiac, screwed over by its own studio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I should have posted my thoughts on the nominations *here* I guess, not where I did (Name Those Nominees). Well, anyway, haha&#8230;</p>
<p>Congrats, joel, Andy H, Alison and Nick! Play hard, win hard! :-)</p>
<p>This Oscar guessing stuff is difficult. It seems like the last two years, for starters, would have been far easier to estimate but this year was something of a train wreck (though sort of a beautiful one, ahaha).</p>
<p>My only real gripe is Juno. I think its chances were helped enormously when so much of the field (Blood and No Country for starters) seemed so bleak. Atonement and Clayton are the most &#8220;conventional&#8221; Best Picture nominees, on paper, and I suppose we may have to think of the Best Picture category as routinely having one of those quirky little comedies among the final five&#8211;Sideways, Little Miss Sunshine and Juno, three out of four years where there was at least one film to lighten things up.</p>
<p>I am scratching my head over Blanchett for Elizabeth II, but she is quite loved.</p>
<p>Oh, and Craig&#8211;sorry for pointing out that Norbit had one nomination over Zodiac&#8217;s zero in the other thread. Hadn&#8217;t seen you point it out here. I suspect there are many online grumbling about that, though, as I saw it originally at H-E. Poor Zodiac, screwed over by its own studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>Thanks for those Jennybee. I love the Roderick Jaynes mention...and poor Kevin O&#039;Connell. Too bad I can&#039;t root for him this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for those Jennybee. I love the Roderick Jaynes mention&#8230;and poor Kevin O&#8217;Connell. Too bad I can&#8217;t root for him this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennybee</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>jennybee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>Good point about TWBB. I wish Greenwood&#039;s score had been deemed eligible, but another part of me is kinda glad TWBB and NCfOM tied. Somehow, it seems right.

Some interesting factoids about this year&#039;s race are here:
http://www.pe.com/entertainment/stories/PE_FEA_oscar_facts22.48f2d563.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about TWBB. I wish Greenwood&#8217;s score had been deemed eligible, but another part of me is kinda glad TWBB and NCfOM tied. Somehow, it seems right.</p>
<p>Some interesting factoids about this year&#8217;s race are here:<br />
<a href="http://www.pe.com/entertainment/stories/PE_FEA_oscar_facts22.48f2d563.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pe.com/entertainment/stories/PE_FEA_oscar_facts22.48f2d563.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3894</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3894</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotta say I&#039;m pleased at how well LiC readers did as a group. Certainly as good as any of the so-called experts.

My two errors this year were: 1) too much reliance on guild voting and 2) a mental block against a very very popular movie.

One last thing, if Jonny Greenwood hadn&#039;t been boned by AMPAS, we might be looking at 9 nominations for TWBB instead of 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotta say I&#8217;m pleased at how well LiC readers did as a group. Certainly as good as any of the so-called experts.</p>
<p>My two errors this year were: 1) too much reliance on guild voting and 2) a mental block against a very very popular movie.</p>
<p>One last thing, if Jonny Greenwood hadn&#8217;t been boned by AMPAS, we might be looking at 9 nominations for TWBB instead of 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennybee</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3893</link>
		<dc:creator>jennybee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3893</guid>
		<description>lol, sartre. I think I&#039;m going to start using that line all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, sartre. I think I&#8217;m going to start using that line all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennybee</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>jennybee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>Yes, Serena was, and she should be proud. Several of us got 4/5, but Serena was the only one to nail those. Myself, I managed 4/5 in most categories on the Sultans charts, but only got 3/5 in several. Serena is Queen Sultana. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Serena was, and she should be proud. Several of us got 4/5, but Serena was the only one to nail those. Myself, I managed 4/5 in most categories on the Sultans charts, but only got 3/5 in several. Serena is Queen Sultana. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartre</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3891</link>
		<dc:creator>sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3891</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Serena!  Queen of the Oscar Prognosticators.

I can see her saying in a commanding voice to the Atonement bashers &#039;I have a hurricane in me that will strip naysayers bare when they dare to try me!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Serena!  Queen of the Oscar Prognosticators.</p>
<p>I can see her saying in a commanding voice to the Atonement bashers &#8216;I have a hurricane in me that will strip naysayers bare when they dare to try me!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living In Cinema, Name Those Nominees Contest Winner&#8230;.Me :) &#171; Fataculture</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3889</link>
		<dc:creator>Living In Cinema, Name Those Nominees Contest Winner&#8230;.Me :) &#171; Fataculture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3889</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of the post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of the post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3888</guid>
		<description>Nicely done Nick.

Serena, A little bird told me you were the only &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.awardsdaily.com/sultans/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sultan of Bling&lt;/a&gt; to have matched the BP noms with your top 5. Is this true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done Nick.</p>
<p>Serena, A little bird told me you were the only <a target="_blank" href="http://www.awardsdaily.com/sultans/" rel="nofollow">Sultan of Bling</a> to have matched the BP noms with your top 5. Is this true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartre</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Hearty congratulations to Nick, Alison, Andy H, Joel, and Alexander!  What a quality team LiC attracts.

I&#039;m particularly happy for Alison and Serena who never forsaked Atonement despite the absence of guild love. 

I&#039;m personally thrilled that TWbB, No Country, and Atonement made it.  That&#039;s about as good an Academy delivery to my own taste as I can ever hope for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearty congratulations to Nick, Alison, Andy H, Joel, and Alexander!  What a quality team LiC attracts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly happy for Alison and Serena who never forsaked Atonement despite the absence of guild love. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally thrilled that TWbB, No Country, and Atonement made it.  That&#8217;s about as good an Academy delivery to my own taste as I can ever hope for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Plowman</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Plowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a fluke! 

Congrats Alison Flynn, Andy H , Alexander and Joel :)

I am surprised by the lack of Into The Wild love, seriously! And the fact that Norbit was nominated, I mean it was probably the reason Eddie Murphy lost out on his Oscar and now it&#039;s up for one! I am so glad I was wrong about Atonement, not snubbed at all. Juno for Best Director - Did not see that one coming!

Now the real fun can begin, predicting the winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a fluke! </p>
<p>Congrats Alison Flynn, Andy H , Alexander and Joel :)</p>
<p>I am surprised by the lack of Into The Wild love, seriously! And the fact that Norbit was nominated, I mean it was probably the reason Eddie Murphy lost out on his Oscar and now it&#8217;s up for one! I am so glad I was wrong about Atonement, not snubbed at all. Juno for Best Director &#8211; Did not see that one coming!</p>
<p>Now the real fun can begin, predicting the winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>I was waiting for someone to post an appropriate thread. 

So that I could make my Nicole Kidmanlike entrance.

*bows*

*clears throat*

Good morning, Mr. Kennedy. Ladies. Gentlemen. 

Every year a ton of people that I love are invariably snubbed. There&#039;s no getting around it. It&#039;s inevitable. So it&#039;s unfortunate for Russell Crowe (in two categories!!!!), Robert Downey Jr., Albert Finney, Terrence Howard, Steve Zahn, Vanessa Redgrave, Keira Knightley, James McAvoy, Jodie Foster, Michael Caine, Jude Law, Emile Hirsch, Sam Riley, Joe Wright, Sidney Lumet &amp; Sean Penn. All of these people (aside from Mr. McAvoy &amp; Mr. Riley)  were in my personal Top 5 lists. Their train stops here.

But, despite all that, I really can&#039;t complain. Chuck may well be on to something. It would&#039;ve been difficult to screw up this year. But yeah, they could&#039;ve done it. Easily. Knowing them. LOL

Actually, I&#039;m absolutely delighted. Most of these categories are so strong that I don&#039;t have an actual right to be upset. All of these people got VERY deserving nods: Ruby Dee, Saoirse Ronan, Javier Bardem, Hal Holbrook, Tom Wilkinson, Julie Christie, Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page, George Clooney, Daniel Day Lewis, Johnny Depp, Viggo Mortensen, Jason Reitman, Paul Thomas Anderson (twice!!!!), Christopher Hampton, Sarah Polley &amp; Diablo Cody. 

The Golden Compass got in for Visual Effects &amp; Art Direction. La Vie En Rose got in for Costumes.

I just saw Atonement again (for the third time last night). I crossed my fingers &amp; hoped passionately . I told myself that if Atonement &amp; TWBB made the final five I would be satisfied. Into The Wild would have made that near perfect. As I would&#039;ve had three selections from my personal top 5. But it&#039;s just dandy the way it stands. I love Juno almost as much. 

I held my breath when Kathy began to announce the BP nominees. There is only one big contender that begins with an A. When she said, &quot;Atonement,&quot; I started screaming. Though I thought NCFOM was far from flawless, it&#039;s a fine multilayered film. MC is strong as well. These are the finest lineups we&#039;ve had for many years in a lot of these categories.

I have yet to see The Savages, CWW or ITVOE. The latter comes out on DVD days before the (scheduled) ceremony. I&#039;ll see the others before the week is out.

Actually, all in all, these nods were quite bloody awesome. 

Oh, yeah...

ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT.ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT.ATONEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YEAH!!!!!

ATONEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was waiting for someone to post an appropriate thread. </p>
<p>So that I could make my Nicole Kidmanlike entrance.</p>
<p>*bows*</p>
<p>*clears throat*</p>
<p>Good morning, Mr. Kennedy. Ladies. Gentlemen. </p>
<p>Every year a ton of people that I love are invariably snubbed. There&#8217;s no getting around it. It&#8217;s inevitable. So it&#8217;s unfortunate for Russell Crowe (in two categories!!!!), Robert Downey Jr., Albert Finney, Terrence Howard, Steve Zahn, Vanessa Redgrave, Keira Knightley, James McAvoy, Jodie Foster, Michael Caine, Jude Law, Emile Hirsch, Sam Riley, Joe Wright, Sidney Lumet &amp; Sean Penn. All of these people (aside from Mr. McAvoy &amp; Mr. Riley)  were in my personal Top 5 lists. Their train stops here.</p>
<p>But, despite all that, I really can&#8217;t complain. Chuck may well be on to something. It would&#8217;ve been difficult to screw up this year. But yeah, they could&#8217;ve done it. Easily. Knowing them. LOL</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m absolutely delighted. Most of these categories are so strong that I don&#8217;t have an actual right to be upset. All of these people got VERY deserving nods: Ruby Dee, Saoirse Ronan, Javier Bardem, Hal Holbrook, Tom Wilkinson, Julie Christie, Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page, George Clooney, Daniel Day Lewis, Johnny Depp, Viggo Mortensen, Jason Reitman, Paul Thomas Anderson (twice!!!!), Christopher Hampton, Sarah Polley &amp; Diablo Cody. </p>
<p>The Golden Compass got in for Visual Effects &amp; Art Direction. La Vie En Rose got in for Costumes.</p>
<p>I just saw Atonement again (for the third time last night). I crossed my fingers &amp; hoped passionately . I told myself that if Atonement &amp; TWBB made the final five I would be satisfied. Into The Wild would have made that near perfect. As I would&#8217;ve had three selections from my personal top 5. But it&#8217;s just dandy the way it stands. I love Juno almost as much. </p>
<p>I held my breath when Kathy began to announce the BP nominees. There is only one big contender that begins with an A. When she said, &#8220;Atonement,&#8221; I started screaming. Though I thought NCFOM was far from flawless, it&#8217;s a fine multilayered film. MC is strong as well. These are the finest lineups we&#8217;ve had for many years in a lot of these categories.</p>
<p>I have yet to see The Savages, CWW or ITVOE. The latter comes out on DVD days before the (scheduled) ceremony. I&#8217;ll see the others before the week is out.</p>
<p>Actually, all in all, these nods were quite bloody awesome. </p>
<p>Oh, yeah&#8230;</p>
<p>ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT.ATONEMENT. ATONEMENT.ATONEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>YEAH!!!!!</p>
<p>ATONEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3880</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3880</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my one complaint:
Norbit - 1 nomination
Zodiac - 0 nominations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my one complaint:<br />
Norbit &#8211; 1 nomination<br />
Zodiac &#8211; 0 nominations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennybee</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>jennybee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>Good job, everyone! Nice nominations, overall, I thought. You know, joel, Surf&#039;s Up also did really well at the Annies this year, getting something like 10 nominations. I thought at the time that was a good indication it could be a spoiler, but I managed to completely forget about it when it got left out of the rest of the awards season. I agree, it certainly didn&#039;t look too original, but there may be more quality there than it&#039;s been given credit for. On the other hand, it might just be a giant travesty. I was surprised The Simpsons were knocked off, but I bet Matt Groening &amp; Co. have some fun with that in future scripts (once they can write them again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, everyone! Nice nominations, overall, I thought. You know, joel, Surf&#8217;s Up also did really well at the Annies this year, getting something like 10 nominations. I thought at the time that was a good indication it could be a spoiler, but I managed to completely forget about it when it got left out of the rest of the awards season. I agree, it certainly didn&#8217;t look too original, but there may be more quality there than it&#8217;s been given credit for. On the other hand, it might just be a giant travesty. I was surprised The Simpsons were knocked off, but I bet Matt Groening &amp; Co. have some fun with that in future scripts (once they can write them again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3873</guid>
		<description>The only bizarre thing for me is that my two favorite movies of the year also tied for the most nominations. Am I just getting old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only bizarre thing for me is that my two favorite movies of the year also tied for the most nominations. Am I just getting old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Flynn</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3871</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3871</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Nick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Nick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>Yeah Chuck, I was thinking the same thing. Could have been much worse. It&#039;s going to tough to handicap them this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Chuck, I was thinking the same thing. Could have been much worse. It&#8217;s going to tough to handicap them this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Way to go Nick, Alison, Andy H, and Alexander. I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not in my Oscar voting pool.

And yes, I&#039;m still flabbergasted that Surf&#039;s Up got nominated for anything. Maybe it&#039;s the Citizen Kane of CGI-animated penguin surfing movies but I&#039;ll never know because it just looked like a crass knock-off of Happy Feet intended to capitalize on the success of March of the Penguins. Oh, and look...IT WORKED.

Glad to see Sarah Polley in there. She deserves recognition for her excellent first film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Nick, Alison, Andy H, and Alexander. I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not in my Oscar voting pool.</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;m still flabbergasted that Surf&#8217;s Up got nominated for anything. Maybe it&#8217;s the Citizen Kane of CGI-animated penguin surfing movies but I&#8217;ll never know because it just looked like a crass knock-off of Happy Feet intended to capitalize on the success of March of the Penguins. Oh, and look&#8230;IT WORKED.</p>
<p>Glad to see Sarah Polley in there. She deserves recognition for her excellent first film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/comment-page-1/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/01/22/and-the-nominees-are/#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>As someone who normally bitches and hasn&#039;t watched in a few years, I would like to say that these nominations (a few WTF notwithstanding) are the best display of Academy taste in sometime. Maybe the year was simply too good for them to screw up too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who normally bitches and hasn&#8217;t watched in a few years, I would like to say that these nominations (a few WTF notwithstanding) are the best display of Academy taste in sometime. Maybe the year was simply too good for them to screw up too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
