<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Beverly Nights: &#8217;70s Future Shock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews, news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11893</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11893</guid>
		<description>I faintly remember Futureworld. Barely.

I kind of wish the New Beverly could&#039;ve gotten a hold of Logan&#039;s Run, but Westworld was a fine alternative.

Jeff, I&#039;d never noticed it either until I was standing outside the theater waiting for the ticket booth to open.

Joel, it was a little odd seeing this as an adult because in a way it was like exorcising the boogie man, or looking under the bed and seeing there were no monster&#039;s there. Yul Brynner Acid Face wasn&#039;t quite like my overactive kid&#039;s imagination remembered it...though the crispy Yul Brynner corpse was still pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I faintly remember Futureworld. Barely.</p>
<p>I kind of wish the New Beverly could&#8217;ve gotten a hold of Logan&#8217;s Run, but Westworld was a fine alternative.</p>
<p>Jeff, I&#8217;d never noticed it either until I was standing outside the theater waiting for the ticket booth to open.</p>
<p>Joel, it was a little odd seeing this as an adult because in a way it was like exorcising the boogie man, or looking under the bed and seeing there were no monster&#8217;s there. Yul Brynner Acid Face wasn&#8217;t quite like my overactive kid&#8217;s imagination remembered it&#8230;though the crispy Yul Brynner corpse was still pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff McM</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff McM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11890</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I&#039;ve never noticed that tagline at the bottom of the Westworld poster before - &quot;Where nothing can possibly go wo r n g!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I&#8217;ve never noticed that tagline at the bottom of the Westworld poster before &#8211; &#8220;Where nothing can possibly go wo r n g!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11889</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11889</guid>
		<description>&quot;And right next to these large hydraulic generators, we have our computers operated by men in white lab coats.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And right next to these large hydraulic generators, we have our computers operated by men in white lab coats.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11888</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11888</guid>
		<description>And location shooting in what was likely a rented power plant or substation. You gotta love old-school ingenuity...or cheese, depending on your point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And location shooting in what was likely a rented power plant or substation. You gotta love old-school ingenuity&#8230;or cheese, depending on your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartre</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11885</link>
		<dc:creator>sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11885</guid>
		<description>It always tickles me to see the wall to wall computers with flashing colored lights in these older Sci-Fis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always tickles me to see the wall to wall computers with flashing colored lights in these older Sci-Fis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11884</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11884</guid>
		<description>Wow, I don&#039;t know...that clip was pretty awesome. The bits with the ninja doctors and the red rope were definitely awe-inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I don&#8217;t know&#8230;that clip was pretty awesome. The bits with the ninja doctors and the red rope were definitely awe-inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Coleman</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11882</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11882</guid>
		<description>Aha, Christian, oh well, there&#039;s no accounting for taste when you&#039;re six or seven years old. All I could really remember from it before seeing that YouTube clip was Peter Fonda talking to himself when he&#039;s holding a gun about how bad of a shot he is. &quot;You couldn&#039;t hit the broad side of a barn...&quot; Some movies are best left alone after a certain period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha, Christian, oh well, there&#8217;s no accounting for taste when you&#8217;re six or seven years old. All I could really remember from it before seeing that YouTube clip was Peter Fonda talking to himself when he&#8217;s holding a gun about how bad of a shot he is. &#8220;You couldn&#8217;t hit the broad side of a barn&#8230;&#8221; Some movies are best left alone after a certain period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Flynn</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11878</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11878</guid>
		<description>LOL, sartre. Pobrecito.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, sartre. Pobrecito.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11877</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11877</guid>
		<description>FUTUREWORLD is absolutely awful. But here, check out this scene for yourself and see how cleverly they brought Yul back:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-liEsr974&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FUTUREWORLD is absolutely awful. But here, check out this scene for yourself and see how cleverly they brought Yul back:</p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-liEsr974&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-liEsr974&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartre</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11876</link>
		<dc:creator>sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11876</guid>
		<description>I’ve not watched Soylent Green, but did very much enjoy Westworld for all the reasons described by Craig, Alexander, and Joel.  I’m glad that Brynner’s character wasn’t reprised by Ahnie, it would have been too ironic for an actor made by computers (Commodore 64s) to replace a human one.  

Eighty television channels, Alison!  You are lucky. We were so poor when I was a kid we lived for three months in a paper bag in a septic tank. We used to have to get up at six in the morning, clean the paper bag, eat a crust of stale bread, go to work down t&#039; mill, fourteen hours a day, week-in week-out, for sixpence a week, and when we got home our Dad would thrash us to sleep wi&#039; his belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve not watched Soylent Green, but did very much enjoy Westworld for all the reasons described by Craig, Alexander, and Joel.  I’m glad that Brynner’s character wasn’t reprised by Ahnie, it would have been too ironic for an actor made by computers (Commodore 64s) to replace a human one.  </p>
<p>Eighty television channels, Alison!  You are lucky. We were so poor when I was a kid we lived for three months in a paper bag in a septic tank. We used to have to get up at six in the morning, clean the paper bag, eat a crust of stale bread, go to work down t&#8217; mill, fourteen hours a day, week-in week-out, for sixpence a week, and when we got home our Dad would thrash us to sleep wi&#8217; his belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11872</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11872</guid>
		<description>I completely forgot about Futureworld, which I remember seeing many, many years ago but can&#039;t recall much about. Love Peter Fonda, but he&#039;s no match for the nerdy-lovable Richard Benjamin.

That Westworld poster is creeping me out every time I load the LIC homepage. Yul Brenner with robot jaw is one of my childhood fears.

I didn&#039;t see The Magnificent Seven until many years later (I think Craig introduced me to it...and Seven Samurai) but I&#039;ve never gotten past the idea that my notion of the character is warped by the semi-parody that is Westworld. I think being mildly tramautized by Westworld first actually made his original performance much more gratifying, even if I liked Vaughn, Coburn, and Bronson&#039;s performances more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely forgot about Futureworld, which I remember seeing many, many years ago but can&#8217;t recall much about. Love Peter Fonda, but he&#8217;s no match for the nerdy-lovable Richard Benjamin.</p>
<p>That Westworld poster is creeping me out every time I load the LIC homepage. Yul Brenner with robot jaw is one of my childhood fears.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see The Magnificent Seven until many years later (I think Craig introduced me to it&#8230;and Seven Samurai) but I&#8217;ve never gotten past the idea that my notion of the character is warped by the semi-parody that is Westworld. I think being mildly tramautized by Westworld first actually made his original performance much more gratifying, even if I liked Vaughn, Coburn, and Bronson&#8217;s performances more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Flynn</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11871</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11871</guid>
		<description>I have to pay extra for TCM where I am, Alexander, so, alas, I do not have this channel. Hell, I can barely afford basic cable but at least I have 80 channels of (mostly) crap with it instead of just 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to pay extra for TCM where I am, Alexander, so, alas, I do not have this channel. Hell, I can barely afford basic cable but at least I have 80 channels of (mostly) crap with it instead of just 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Coleman</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11870</guid>
		<description>Both of these are played on TCM from time to time; my DVD recordings of them are both from that channel. Greatest thing on TV, that network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of these are played on TCM from time to time; my DVD recordings of them are both from that channel. Greatest thing on TV, that network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Flynn</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11869</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11869</guid>
		<description>These days, &lt;i&gt;Soylent Green&lt;/i&gt; seems strangely prophetic.

I live nowhere near this theater, so I&#039;ll have to wait for a festival in one of the NY arthouses that plays it or revisit it on DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, <i>Soylent Green</i> seems strangely prophetic.</p>
<p>I live nowhere near this theater, so I&#8217;ll have to wait for a festival in one of the NY arthouses that plays it or revisit it on DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Coleman</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11868</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11868</guid>
		<description>These are two fine films with which to begin a look at &#039;70s Future Shock. Neither is perfect by any means, but they&#039;re both pretty excellent genre movies. I&#039;m particularly a fan of Soylent Green, as it&#039;s directed by the considerably underrated Richard Fleischer.

I can&#039;t seem to remember what Soylent Green &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt;, though. Isn&#039;t it made out of old tires or something?

Never has the term &quot;steely-eyed&quot; been more appropriate for Yul Brenner in Westworld.

The sequel, Futureworld, with Peter Fonda, Blythe Danner and a returning Brenner, was a movie I found nifty when I was really young, but unlike the two movies reviewed here I haven&#039;t seen that one in a long, long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are two fine films with which to begin a look at &#8217;70s Future Shock. Neither is perfect by any means, but they&#8217;re both pretty excellent genre movies. I&#8217;m particularly a fan of Soylent Green, as it&#8217;s directed by the considerably underrated Richard Fleischer.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to remember what Soylent Green <i>is</i>, though. Isn&#8217;t it made out of old tires or something?</p>
<p>Never has the term &#8220;steely-eyed&#8221; been more appropriate for Yul Brenner in Westworld.</p>
<p>The sequel, Futureworld, with Peter Fonda, Blythe Danner and a returning Brenner, was a movie I found nifty when I was really young, but unlike the two movies reviewed here I haven&#8217;t seen that one in a long, long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11866</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11866</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen either of these in many years, but Soylent Green always freaked me out with the idea of people being scooped up into open garbage trucks and Westworld has that utterly creepy performance from Yul Brenner.

I&#039;m so glad that the preposed remake of Westworld, with Ahnold reprising his Terminator role in place of Brenner, never got off the ground. Not only was it a painfully obvious concept, but the idea of Ahnold trying to one-up Brenner&#039;s performance by doing a somewhat meta self-mocking take on his own robotic acting just seems like too much.

Funny how Crichton&#039;s take on man-made technology gone awry has had such a profound effect on filmgoers over the years. Andromeda Strain remains a great, overlooked movie and lord knows Jurassic Park is actually a pretty good story/movie, warts and all.

I am ignoring Sphere and Congo, but they don&#039;t really cover the same ground anyway.

That Christian guy owes me two dollars. I want my two dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen either of these in many years, but Soylent Green always freaked me out with the idea of people being scooped up into open garbage trucks and Westworld has that utterly creepy performance from Yul Brenner.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad that the preposed remake of Westworld, with Ahnold reprising his Terminator role in place of Brenner, never got off the ground. Not only was it a painfully obvious concept, but the idea of Ahnold trying to one-up Brenner&#8217;s performance by doing a somewhat meta self-mocking take on his own robotic acting just seems like too much.</p>
<p>Funny how Crichton&#8217;s take on man-made technology gone awry has had such a profound effect on filmgoers over the years. Andromeda Strain remains a great, overlooked movie and lord knows Jurassic Park is actually a pretty good story/movie, warts and all.</p>
<p>I am ignoring Sphere and Congo, but they don&#8217;t really cover the same ground anyway.</p>
<p>That Christian guy owes me two dollars. I want my two dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11861</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11861</guid>
		<description>Tell him he owes me 20 bucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell him he owes me 20 bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11859</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11859</guid>
		<description>Christian is good people. I can vouch for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian is good people. I can vouch for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-11850</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/2008/05/10/new-beverly-nights-70s-future-shock/#comment-11850</guid>
		<description>Well, I personally don&#039;t know what to think until Christian Divine has his say. But that&#039;s me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I personally don&#8217;t know what to think until Christian Divine has his say. But that&#8217;s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
