<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trailer: A Nightmare on Elm Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livingincinema.com/2009/09/28/trailer-a-nightmare-on-elm-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livingincinema.com/2009/09/28/trailer-a-nightmare-on-elm-street/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews, news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: frankbooth</title>
		<link>http://livingincinema.com/2009/09/28/trailer-a-nightmare-on-elm-street/comment-page-1/#comment-85283</link>
		<dc:creator>frankbooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livingincinema.com/?p=8305#comment-85283</guid>
		<description>I was almost afraid to watch it. Looks like bigger sets, slicker cinematography and lots of slo-mo.

What do you do with a remake like this? If you stray too far from the original, you&#039;ve fucked up a genre classic. If you hew too closely, it&#039;s a pointless rehash.

The worst-of-both-worlds approach is when they make an uninspired copy but then throw in some stupid, random departure just for the hell of it.

The only reason I might consider seeing it is to check out what JEH does with the character. I&#039;ll keep expectations very low and wait for the reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was almost afraid to watch it. Looks like bigger sets, slicker cinematography and lots of slo-mo.</p>
<p>What do you do with a remake like this? If you stray too far from the original, you&#8217;ve fucked up a genre classic. If you hew too closely, it&#8217;s a pointless rehash.</p>
<p>The worst-of-both-worlds approach is when they make an uninspired copy but then throw in some stupid, random departure just for the hell of it.</p>
<p>The only reason I might consider seeing it is to check out what JEH does with the character. I&#8217;ll keep expectations very low and wait for the reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
